US Supreme Court’s Esteras Ruling On Factoring “Retribution” Into Supervised Release Decisions Will Likely Have Limited Practical Impact
The Supreme Court of the United States' decision last week in Esteras v. United States1 restricted the factors lower courts may consider in imposing prison sentences following supervised release revocations. Those awaiting the Court's decision vigorously deliberated the extent to which the Court would constrain district judges' ability to sentence supervised release offenders based on past bad behavior, rather than on "forward-looking" factors. With Esteras decided, the practical impact on individual defendants—in the white-collar crime context and elsewhere—is [...]